Opinion
2:19-cv-00595-APG-NJK
10-30-2023
SNOW COVERED CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM WEIDNER, ANDREW FONFA, DAVID JACOBY, and LUCKY DRAGON LP, Defendants.
Bob L. Olson (NV Bar No. 3783) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. James D. McCarthy (admitted pro hac vice) Mary Ann Joerres (admitted pro hac vice) David Reynolds (admitted pro hac vice) Melissa Marrero (admitted pro hac vice) DIAMOND MCCARTHY, LLP Attorneys for Snow Covered Capital, LLC Oliver J. Pancheri (NV Bar No. 7476 Nicholas J. Santoro (NV Bar No. 0532) HOLLEY DRIGGS David Brian Snyder (admitted pro hac vice) FOX ROTHSCHILD Attorneys for Defendants William Weidner and David Jacoby Robert Hernquist (NV Bar No. 10616) Mark Gardberg (NV Bar No. 10879) HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Jodi Fonfa, as Executrix to Decedent Estate of Andrew S. Fonfa
Bob L. Olson (NV Bar No. 3783)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
James D. McCarthy (admitted pro hac vice)
Mary Ann Joerres (admitted pro hac vice)
David Reynolds (admitted pro hac vice)
Melissa Marrero (admitted pro hac vice)
DIAMOND MCCARTHY, LLP
Attorneys for Snow Covered Capital, LLC
Oliver J. Pancheri (NV Bar No. 7476
Nicholas J. Santoro (NV Bar No. 0532)
HOLLEY DRIGGS
David Brian Snyder (admitted pro hac vice)
FOX ROTHSCHILD
Attorneys for Defendants William Weidner and David Jacoby
Robert Hernquist (NV Bar No. 10616)
Mark Gardberg (NV Bar No. 10879)
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
Attorneys for Defendant Jodi Fonfa, as Executrix to Decedent Estate of Andrew S. Fonfa
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF SNOW COVERED CAPITAL, LLC (“SCC”) TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS WEIDNER AND JACOBY “MOTION IN LIMINE SEEKING TO PRECLUDE: (1) “EVIDENCE RELATED TO FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS” [ECF NO. 325]; AND (2) “EVIDENCE RELATED TO PLAINTIFF'S PURPORTED POSTFORECLOSURE DAMAGES.” [ECF NO. 324]
(FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff Snow Covered Capital, LLC (“SCC”) and Defendants William Weidner, David Jacoby and the Estate of Andrew Fonfa hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Plaintiff to file its response briefs to Defendants Weidner and Jacoby's Motions in Limine Seeking to Preclude: (1) “Evidence Related to Fraudulent Transfers” [ECF No. 325); and (2) “Evidence Related to 1072247 Plaintiff's Purported Post-Foreclosure Damages” [ECF No. 324] from the current due date of October 27, 2023 to November 3, 2023:
Good cause exists for this extension as the lawyers who are involved in responding to these motions in limine have been tied up in other cases (including but not limited to winding up the settlement of a separate federal court action) during the time for responding to these two motions. SCC therefore seeks a seven (7) day extension in which to file its responses to the two motions in limine.
This is the first request to extend SCC's response deadline.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.