From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snodgrass v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 2, 2022
351 So. 3d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-2046

12-02-2022

Daniel E. SNODGRASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Daniel E. Snodgrass, Lake City, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Daniel E. Snodgrass, Lake City, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously affirmed the trial court's order denying Appellant's motion for postconviction relief in Putnam County Circuit Court Case Number 2007-CF-002375. Because it appears that Appellant's postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) ; State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

APPELLANT WARNED.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Snodgrass v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 2, 2022
351 So. 3d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Snodgrass v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daniel E. SNODGRASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 667 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)