From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snodgrass v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 1931
2 P.2d 982 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

No. A-8081.

Opinion Filed September 5, 1931.

(Syllabus.)

Automobiles — Conviction for Manslaughter Perpetrated in Driving While Intoxicated Sustained. Record examined, and evidence held sufficient to sustain judgment.

Appeal from District Court, Seminole County; George C. Crump, Judge.

J. E. Snodgrass was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Bishop Short, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Seminole county of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at four years in the state penitentiary.

The record discloses that at the time charged defendant was driving an automobile while in an intoxicated condition, and while doing so struck and killed Harry Hannah, a youth about 12 years old. Defendant denied that he was intoxicated; said he had only taken one small sip of whisky, and that the Hannah boy had stopped in the highway to tie his shoe, and that defendant, in meeting another car, was forced to one side, and struck him accidentally and without fault on his part. The evidence of the guilt of defendant is conclusive, and it appears the jury was lenient in assessing the punishment. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have examined the record with care, and perceive no substantial error.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Snodgrass v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 1931
2 P.2d 982 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Snodgrass v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. E. SNODGRASS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 5, 1931

Citations

2 P.2d 982 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
2 P.2d 982