From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sno-Wite, Inc. v. Gerald Operating Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1948
80 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1948)

Summary

In Sno-Wite, Inc., v. Gerald Operating Corp. (297 N.Y. 1007) we decided a suit brought under this same subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Rent Law, but there the tenant had removed from the rented premises only after the landlord had actually commenced an eviction proceeding on the ground of his intention, himself to use the premises.

Summary of this case from Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co.

Opinion

Argued April 13, 1948

Decided May 20, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, O'BRIEN, J.

Harold J. Treanor for appellant.

Charles N. Maybruck for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs. Questions certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Sno-Wite, Inc. v. Gerald Operating Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1948
80 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1948)

In Sno-Wite, Inc., v. Gerald Operating Corp. (297 N.Y. 1007) we decided a suit brought under this same subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Rent Law, but there the tenant had removed from the rented premises only after the landlord had actually commenced an eviction proceeding on the ground of his intention, himself to use the premises.

Summary of this case from Rosner v. Textile Binding Trimming Co.
Case details for

Sno-Wite, Inc. v. Gerald Operating Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SNO-WITE, INC., Respondent, v. GERALD OPERATING CORP., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 20, 1948

Citations

80 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1948)
80 N.E.2d 534

Citing Cases

Edward Tarr, Inc. v. Phoenix Publications, Inc.

The general provisions of section 8 refer to a tenant "removed" from business space; and the subdivision (k)…

A.B. Magonigle Trucking Co., Inc. v. Tambini

) As against the landlord, it is but repetitious of the first cause of action. ( Sno-Wite, Inc., v. Gerald…