OCGA § 5-5-24 (c). Because Reidling denied being on the property for an unlawful purpose and there was no evidence presented about the dollar amount of the damages, the requested charge on the lesser included offense of criminal trespass was not warranted. See OCGA § 16-7-21 (a) and (b) (1); Moore v. State, 280 Ga. App. 894, 898 (6) (c) ( 635 SE2d 253) (2006) (defendant not entitled to charge on criminal trespass under OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (1) when he testified that he entered property for a lawful purpose); Snipes v. State, 257 Ga. App. 713, 714-715 ( 572 SE2d 62) (2002) (defendant not entitled to charge on criminal trespass under OCGA § 16-7-21 (a) when no evidence was presented as to the amount of damage done and whether it was more or less than $500). Judgment affirmed. Mikell and Dillard, JJ., concur.

Further, Herbert denied any intent to damage the screen and implied that it may have been damaged when he landed on it after he was shot.Snipes v. State, 257 Ga. App. 713, 714-715 ( 572 SE2d 62) (2002). Id. at 715 (citations omitted).

(Citation omitted.) Snipes v. State, 257 Ga. App. 713, 714-715 ( 572 SE2d 62) (2002). Id. at 715.