Opinion
Case No. 3:16-cv-02236-JR
03-09-2018
VALORIE SNIDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
ORDER
:
Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir, 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 34), and the Commissioner has filed a response to those objections (doc. 35). Thus, I review the F&R de novo.
Having reviewed the record and the F&R de novo, I find no error in Judge Russo's reasoning.
Thus, I adopt Magistrate Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 29) in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the F&R and this order. This case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 9th day of March, 2018.
/s/_________
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge