Snelling v. Clark

Full title: Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Carol CLARK, et al., Respondents.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

603 S.W.3d 699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108068

04-14-2020

Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Carol CLARK, et al., Respondents.

FOR APPELLANT, Lonnie Snelling – PRO SE, 1518-79 Street, St. Louis, MO 63130. For Respondent, Chelsea Mannery, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT, Lonnie Snelling – PRO SE, 1518-79^th Street, St. Louis, MO 63130.

For Respondent, Chelsea Mannery, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 74.06(b)(4) motion to set aside a previous judgment. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).