Opinion
09-P-1549
11-04-2011
EMORY G. SNELL, JR. v. SUPERINTENDENT, SOUZA BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER & others.
NOTICE: Decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28 are primarily addressed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panel's decisional rationale. Moreover, rule 1:28 decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28, issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the limitations noted above, not as binding precedent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
Having reviewed and considered the briefs (and the arguments made therein), the appendices, and the comprehensive, detailed, and thoughtful memorandum of decision by the Superior Court judge, we perceive no error in the judge's ruling below. The order entering judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the Superior Court judge's memorandum of decision.
So ordered.
By the Court (Graham, Rubin & Wolohojian, JJ.),
Individually, and in her official capacity.