From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snell v. State

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS NEWPORT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT
Jul 28, 2016
Case No. PM-2014-5193 (R.I. Super. Jul. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. PM-2014-5193

07-28-2016

CURLEY SNELL Petitioner, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND Defendant.

ATTORNEYS: For Plaintiff: Matthew S. Dawson, Esq. For Defendant: Jeanine P. McConaghy, Esq.


AMENDED DECISION NUGENT , J. This Amended Decision is being filed to correct an error in the original Decision filed on July 20, 2016. On page 6, the first sentence of the second full paragraph should read as follows:

"Rather, it is the Court's opinion that the Board's April 16, 2014 decision fulfilled the Board's statutory requirements and did not violate the Petitioner's constitutional rights."

The remaining contents of the Decision filed on July 20, 2016 remain the same.

ATTORNEYS:

For Plaintiff: Matthew S. Dawson, Esq. For Defendant: Jeanine P. McConaghy, Esq.


Summaries of

Snell v. State

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS NEWPORT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT
Jul 28, 2016
Case No. PM-2014-5193 (R.I. Super. Jul. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Snell v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURLEY SNELL Petitioner, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND Defendant.

Court:STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS NEWPORT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT

Date published: Jul 28, 2016

Citations

Case No. PM-2014-5193 (R.I. Super. Jul. 28, 2016)