From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

May, 1908.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that as the cause of action set forth in the complaint was not referable and was denied by the answer and the long account was contained in the counterclaim, the Special Term had no authority to grant the order of reference. ( Steck v. Colorado Fuel Iron Co., 142 N.Y. 236.) All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., and Williams, J., who dissented on the authority of Irving v. Irving (90 Hun, 423; affd., 149 N.Y. 573.)


Summaries of

Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills

Case Details

Full title:Ralph M. Snell, Appellant, v. Niagara Paper Mills, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1908

Citations

126 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)