From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sneed v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 15, 2013
No. 05-12-01061-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-01061-CR

11-15-2013

DARRELL DEWAYNE SNEED, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-60730-Y


ORDER

The Court has before it appellant's November 13, 2013 motion to order the court reporter to file the reporter's record and to extend time to file his brief. In the motion, counsel Riann Moore acknowledges that appellant's brief was originally due August 1, 2013, the appeal was previously abated for findings regarding why appellant's brief has not been filed, and that following receipt of the trial court's findings, this Court ordered appellant to file a brief by November 12, 2013. Ms. Moore states that upon reviewing the record, she determined a portion of the record is missing and that appellant's brief cannot be filed until the record is complete. Ms. Moore does not explain why this issue was not brought to the trial court's attention during the first abatement proceeding or why she did not bring the matter to this Court's attention until the day appellant's brief was due. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS appellant's November 13, 2013 motion as follows:

We ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding whether the record filed in this appeal contains a complete transcription of all proceedings.

• If the trial court determines the record is not complete, the trial court shall make a finding as to the name and contact number of each and every court reporter who recorded the proceedings.
• The trial court shall next determine what is missing from the record; whether the notes of any missing portions are available and can be transcribed; the name and contact information of the court reporter who will transcribe those portions; and the date by which all missing portions of the record will be filed.
• If the trial court determines that the notes of any missing portions are not available and cannot be transcribed, the trial court shall determine whether appellant is at fault for the lost or missing portions and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court by DECEMBER 13, 2013.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Michael Snipes, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Katherine Drew, Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender's Office; Riann Moore, Dallas County Public Defender's Office; and Michael Casillas, Dallas County District Attorney's Office.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated on December 13, 2013 or when the findings are received.

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Sneed v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 15, 2013
No. 05-12-01061-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Sneed v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL DEWAYNE SNEED, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Nov 15, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-01061-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2013)