From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snead v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 28, 2020
CASE NO. 1:19CV2754 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:19CV2754

08-28-2020

JENNIFER DAWN SNEAD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

An Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") denied Plaintiff Jennifer Dawn Snead's application for supplemental security income ("SSI") after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ's decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner's decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). On August 10, 2020, the magistrate judge submitted a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) recommending that the Court vacate the Commissioner's decision and remand the case to the Commissioner.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. On August 21, 2020, the Commissioner filed a Response to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16), stating that the Commissioner will not be filing objections. Furthermore, Plaintiff has not filed any objections, evidencing satisfaction with the magistrate judge's recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v . Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd , 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v . Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v . Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. The Court vacates the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and remands this case to the Commissioner for rehearing and a new decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED. August 28, 2020
Date

/s/ Benita Y . Pearson

Benita Y. Pearson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Snead v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 28, 2020
CASE NO. 1:19CV2754 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Snead v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER DAWN SNEAD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 1:19CV2754 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

Neupane v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

See 20 C.F.R. § 416.335.” Snead v. Saul, No. 1:19CV2754, 2020 WL 5097580, at *11 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2020),…

Kennedy v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Accordingly, for purposes of Plaintiff's current application, the previous adjudicated period was June 6,…