From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smyth v. Stockton & Copperapolis R. Co.

Supreme Court of California
Aug 18, 1884
4 P. 505 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         Department 1. Appeal from the superior court of San Joaquin county.

          SYLLABUS

         RAILROAD COMPANY--LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY FIRES.

         A railroad company is not liable for damages caused by fire escaping from its engines, if such engines are in good order, properly constructed, and supplied with the best appliances in use to prevent the escape of fire, unless the fire escaped through the negligence of the servants of said railroad company in managing such engines.

         W. L. Dudley, for appellant.

         D. S. & S. L. Terry, for respondent.


         ROSS, J., McKINSTRY, J.; McKEE, J.

          OPINION

          ROSS, J.

         The plaintiff sued to recover of defendant damages for the destruction by fire of certain property alleged to have been communicated by sparks emitted from one of defendant's locomotives. As to whether the engine was in proper order and was properly managed by the employes of defendant at the time in question, the testimony on behalf of the respective parties differed. Upon the conclusion of the evidence the defendant requested the court to charge the jury, among other things, that if they believed from the evidence "that the damages claimed by the plaintiff were caused by fire escaping from defendant's engine, and find further that the engine was in good order, properly constructed, and supplied with the best appliances in use to prevent the escape of fire, then the defendant was not guilty of negligence in such escape of the fire, and is not liable, unless the fire escaped through the negligence of the agents and servants of the defendant in managing the engine and machinery." This instruction was refused. In view of the testimony in the case it ought to have been given. Shear. & R. Neg. (3d Ed.) §§ 332, 333, 334, and authorities there cited.

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

         We concur: McKINSTRY, J.; McKEE, J.


Summaries of

Smyth v. Stockton & Copperapolis R. Co.

Supreme Court of California
Aug 18, 1884
4 P. 505 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Smyth v. Stockton & Copperapolis R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SMYTH v. THE STOCKTON & COPPERAPOLIS R. CO

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 18, 1884

Citations

4 P. 505 (Cal. 1884)