From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smolska v. Ct. Common Pleas of Hudson Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1928 —

Decided October 15, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 160.

For the appellant, Raskin, Hornstein Raskin.

For the respondents, Kellogg Chance.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Smolska v. Ct. Common Pleas of Hudson Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Smolska v. Ct. Common Pleas of Hudson Co.

Case Details

Full title:DOMINICKA SMOLSKA, APPELLANT, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF HUDSON COUNTY ET…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 1928

Citations

143 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
143 A. 919

Citing Cases

Sack v. City of Ocean City

The employe could have waited until the second filing date and much later for the filing of his first…

Lepf v. Chambersburg Building & Loan Ass'n

This, as we have pointed out, the petitioner failed to do, and such failure justified the dismissal. Hvizdock…