From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smolen v. Cosco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In this action against, inter alia, two foreign corporations which are not authorized to do business in this State, the plaintiff's failure to comply with Business Corporations Law § 307 by not filing an affidavit of compliance with the clerk of the court (see, Business Corporations Law § 307 [c] [2]) within the Statute of Limitations was a jurisdictional defect (see, Flick v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 76 N.Y.2d 50; see also, Stewart v Volkswagen of Am., 81 N.Y.2d 203, 207). To the extent that we have held that such an omission constitutes a mere irregularity that could be remedied by resort to CPLR 2001 and 2004 (see, Piekarz v. Columbia Laundry Mach. Co., 150 A.D.2d 539; Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co., 91 A.D.2d 681), our prior determinations have been effectively overruled by Flick. Since the court did not obtain personal jurisdiction over Cosco, Inc., and Cosco Home Products within the applicable periods of limitations, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint with respect to them as time-barred. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smolen v. Cosco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Smolen v. Cosco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH SMOLEN, Appellant, v. COSCO, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 228

Citing Cases

Wynwood Capital Grp. v. Confluence Corp.

Service is not deemed complete until 10 days after such papers are filed (see Business Corporation Law § 307…

Vannorden v. Mann Edge Tool

The Court of Appeals has made clear that the "precisely . . . delineated sequence set forth in the statute"…