Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

SMITTY'S SUPER VALU v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

126 Ariz. 377 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
SMITTY'S SUPER VALU v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

2 Citing cases

  1. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

    616 P.2d 42 (Ariz. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    The Court of Appeals held that the award ordering a reopening of claimant's case was not supported by any evidence and set the award aside. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 23, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17 A.R.S. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 126 Ariz. 377, 616 P.2d 52 (App. 1979), vacated. Award of the Industrial Commission affirmed.

  2. Bell v. Industrial Commission

    617 P.2d 44 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 3 times
    In Bell, the cause of the claimant's symptoms was tentatively diagnosed and the relationship to his industrial head injury hypothesized.

    Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial Commission, 120 Ariz. 137, 584 P.2d 601 (1978). The carrier in the answering brief also relied upon the recent case of Smitty's Super Value, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 126 Ariz. 377, 616 P.2d 52 (1980). The carrier stated that "It is the position of the State Compensation Fund that the matter herein is directly on point with Smitty's Super Value, Inc."