From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 30, 1992
224 Conn. 913 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

(14633)

Decided October 30, 1992


The defendants The Historical Society of the Town of Greenwich, Incorporated, and Anita de Lessups Keefe's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 28 [AC 10431], is granted, limited to the following question:

"In acting on a subdivision proposal that conforms to applicable zoning regulations, may a planning and zoning commission take into account the fact that the property is located in a historic district and that the development of the property may be inconsistent with historic preservation of the district?"


William E. Hegarty, in support of the petition.

E. Don Smith, pro se, and Eileen Smith, pro se, in opposition.


Summaries of

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 30, 1992
224 Conn. 913 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:E. DON SMITH ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF GREENWICH ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 30, 1992

Citations

224 Conn. 913 (Conn. 1992)
617 A.2d 166

Citing Cases

Zampaglione v. Dempsey

" Although the 'lack of a remedy under the contract is a precondition for recovery based upon unjust…

Thompson v. Orcutt

" (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Polverari v. Peatt, 29 Conn. App. 191, 202, 614 A.2d…