From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Winfrey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 9, 2010
395 F. App'x 32 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

NO. 10-1660.

Submitted: August 18, 2010.

Decided: September 9, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS).

William Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William Earl Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing this civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Winfrey, No. 2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS (E.D.Va. May 18, 2010). The motion to seal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Winfrey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 9, 2010
395 F. App'x 32 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Smith v. Winfrey

Case Details

Full title:William Earl SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Oprah WINFREY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 9, 2010

Citations

395 F. App'x 32 (4th Cir. 2010)