From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Williamson

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 23, 2023
22-CV-00174 GLS/TWD (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2023)

Opinion

22-CV-00174 GLS/TWD

10-23-2023

SINCERE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ORC WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants.

Sincere Smith, Plaintiff pro se. LETITIA JAMES Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Mark J. Dolan Assistant Attorney General, of Counsel.


Sincere Smith, Plaintiff pro se.

LETITIA JAMES Attorney for Defendants The Capitol

Mark J. Dolan Assistant Attorney General, of Counsel.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISCONTINUANCE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)

Gary L. Sharpe, Senior District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, Plaintiff and the attorneys of record for defendants Gregory Mayo (sued herein as “Sgt Mayo”), Christopher Miller (sued herein as “Superintendent Miller”), Leonard Rena (sued herein as “ORC Rena”), Jeffrey Williamson (sued herein as “ORC Williamson”), Stephen Casanova (sued herein as “Nurse Casanova”), Ashley Montalto (sued herein as “ORC Moltavo”), Katherine G. Henley (sued herein as “CHO Henley”), Teri Kozak (sued herein as “Dept Kosak”), Keith Klein (sued herein as “Lt Klein”), John Nickless (sued herein as “ORC Nickles”), Kenneth Pope (sued herein as “C.O. Pope”), William Burns (sued herein as “Dept Burns”), Devrin Perdue (sued herein as “C.O. Perdue”), Luke Funke (sued herein as “ORC Funk”), Justin Kotary (sued herein as “C.O. Kotary”), Michael Fischer (sued herein as “Dept Fischer”), Donald E. Venettozzi (sued herein as “Dept Venetozzi”), Paul J. Piersma (sued herein as “ORC Piersma”), Anthony Rodriguez (sued herein as “A. Rodriguez”), Nicolas Leone (sued herein as “Sgt N. Leone”), Amira Green (sued herein as “ORC Green”), Lauren Buehler (sued herein as “ORC Bueler”) (collectively “Defendants”), that whereas no party hereto is an infant or incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, that the above entitled action be and the same hereby is partially discontinued on the following grounds and conditions:

1. Plaintiff voluntarily discontinues all claims in the Complaint [Dkt. 1] alleging Fourteenth Amendment due process claims asserted against Defendants Miller and Rodriguez arising from the disciplinary hearing determinations, sanctions, and appeals stemming from the hearing conducted at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, with prejudice and without damages, costs, interest or attorneys' fees;

2. Plaintiff voluntarily discontinues all claims in the Complaint [Dkt. 1] alleging Fourteenth Amendment due process claims asserted against Defendants Green, Piersma, Williamson, Buehler, Funke, Rena, Klein, Fischer, Kosak, Bums, Montalto, Mayo, Nickless, Rodriguez, and Venettozzi arising from allegations that they interfered with Plaintiff s progression in and/or completion of the step-down program at MidState Correctional Facility, with prejudice and without damages, costs, interest or attorneys' fees

3. The foregoing constitutes the entire agreement of the parties.

IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this stipulation may be signed and/or executed by facsimile and a facsimile copy may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Smith v. Williamson

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 23, 2023
22-CV-00174 GLS/TWD (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:SINCERE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ORC WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Oct 23, 2023

Citations

22-CV-00174 GLS/TWD (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2023)