From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 12, 2022
1:21-CV-190 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-190

07-12-2022

NANCY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MARK WHITE, L.M.D.T.F., Defendant.


JUDGMENT ORDER

Curtis L. Collier Judge

On June 21, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger filed a report and recommendation (the “R&R”) upon screening Plaintiff's pro se complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 7.) No objection has been filed to the R&R within the given fourteen days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d) (allowing three additional days after service by mail). Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R&R (Doc. 7). Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jul 12, 2022
1:21-CV-190 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. White

Case Details

Full title:NANCY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MARK WHITE, L.M.D.T.F., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-190 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 12, 2022)

Citing Cases

Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

“When conducting a screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), it is appropriate for the Court to consider…