From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Wash. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 11, 2013
CASE NO. C11-5731 BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C11-5731 BHS

04-11-2013

TONY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 37. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff's claim relating to not having traditional foods at the end of Ramadan Feast should be dismissed without prejudice. This claim was not exhausted through the prison grievance system. All other claims should be dismissed with prejudice; and

(3) In forma pauperis status is revoked for purposes of appeal.

____________________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Wash. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 11, 2013
CASE NO. C11-5731 BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Wash. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:TONY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C11-5731 BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2013)

Citing Cases

Sutton v. White

) (“[Plaintiff] has not demonstrated that the reduction in food for one meal was ‘sufficiently serious' to…

DeLeon v. Pierce Cnty. Jail

SeeWilson v. Pima Cnty. Jail, 256 F. App'x. 949, 950 (9th Cir. 2007) (inmate did not suffer a serious…