From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Wasden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 11, 2014
749 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 12–35275.

2014-04-11

Lanny SMITH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Lawrence WASDEN and Brent Reinke, Respondents–Appellees.

Elisa G. Massoth, Esquire, Elisa G. Massoth, PLLC, Payette, ID, Petitioner–Appellant. L. Lamont Anderson, Office of the Idaho Attorney General Boise, ID, for Respondents–Appellees.


Elisa G. Massoth, Esquire, Elisa G. Massoth, PLLC, Payette, ID, Petitioner–Appellant. L. Lamont Anderson, Office of the Idaho Attorney General Boise, ID, for Respondents–Appellees.
D.C. No. 4:08–cv–00227–EJL, District of Idaho, Pocatello.
Before: PREGERSON, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is remanded to the district court. The district court shall exercise its discretion to establish a briefing schedule allowing Petitioner–Appellant Smith a reasonable amount of time to complete review of the supplemental discovery provided by the State, and to file a supplement to his habeas petition, or to re-file an updated original habeas petition, and to allow for responsive briefing.

This panel will retain jurisdiction over any future appeal related to this petition.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Smith v. Wasden

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 11, 2014
749 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Wasden

Case Details

Full title:Lanny SMITH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Lawrence WASDEN and Brent Reinke…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Apr 11, 2014

Citations

749 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2014)