From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1984
99 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

January 23, 1984


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Sullivan, J.), entered June 15, 1983, which granted plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment and denied defendant's cross motion to compel acceptance of its answer. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, plaintiffs' motion denied and defendant's cross motion granted. The defendant's time to serve its answer is extended until 10 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Defendant's delay in serving its answer should be excused. The period of delay, four days, is short, the excuse (the admittedly ongoing settlement negotiations between counsel) is reasonable, there is no prejudice to the plaintiffs, and defendant has tendered an affidavit of a witness attesting to a meritorious defense (see Q.P.I. Rests. v Slevin, 60 N.Y.2d 676; Weissblum v Mostafzafan Foundation, 60 N.Y.2d 637; Eddy v Tops Friendly Markets, 59 N.Y.2d 692; Pazienza v Floral Pet, 98 A.D.2d 743). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1984
99 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Smith v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NANCY SMITH et al., Respondents, v. WALDBAUM'S SUPERMARKET, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Space Ordinance Systems v. W. Dynamics Int'l

In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme…

Rosenzweig v. Gubner

The branch of the cross motion which seeks permission to serve and file an answer to the complaint is…