From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Vantell

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jan 31, 2022
2:21-cv-02689-MSN-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02689-MSN-tmp

01-31-2022

CARLOS SMITH, Petitioner, v. VINCENT VANTELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE

MARK S. NORRIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Respondent's First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. (ECF No. 12.) For good cause shown, the Court finds the Motion should be GRANTED. Respondent shall have through March 5, 2021, to respond to Petitioner's habeas corpus petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Smith v. Vantell

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jan 31, 2022
2:21-cv-02689-MSN-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Vantell

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS SMITH, Petitioner, v. VINCENT VANTELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Jan 31, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02689-MSN-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 31, 2022)