From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

1289 37/14 1845

05-26-2016

In re Danielle Smith, Petitioner, v. Hon. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., et al., Respondents.

Dale L. Smith, New York, for Danielle Smith, petitioner. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Marc F. Scholl of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Gregory Carro, respondent.


Dale L. Smith, New York, for Danielle Smith, petitioner.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Marc F. Scholl of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Gregory Carro, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: MAY 26, 2016

CLERK


Summaries of

Smith v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:In re Danielle Smith, Petitioner, v. Hon. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4115
30 N.Y.S.3d 823