From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. U.S. Attorney General

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 2, 2008
Civil Action No. 3:07cv156 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 2, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:07cv156.

January 2, 2008


ORDER GRANTING IFP BUT DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PAY THE $5.00 FILING FEE


On November 30, 2007, the pro se petitioner initiated this case by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case is before the undersigned on the petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") and Prisoner Trust Account Report.

All litigants are required to pay the costs and fees associated with civil lawsuits unless their financial condition warrants a grant of IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Therefore, if a petitioner submits a certified copy of his trust fund statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the action, then the Court may consider his request. In this case, the petitioner asserts in his affidavit that he not is employed, that he has no asserts, and that he does not receive money from outside sources. However, although the ledger sheets to the petitioner's inmate account show that he is not employed by the institution where he is incarcerated, the ledger sheets also show that the petitioner receives money from outside sources on a regular basis. In fact, the petitioner's ledger sheets show that during the six months preceding the filing of this action, the petitioner's inmate account received average monthly deposits of $137.28.

Accordingly, even though the Court finds that the petitioner is a pauper and GRANTS his IFP motion (dckt. 4), because the petitioner receives enough funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee, he will be required to pay that fee within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. The failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this case without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se petitioner.


Summaries of

Smith v. U.S. Attorney General

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 2, 2008
Civil Action No. 3:07cv156 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. U.S. Attorney General

Case Details

Full title:DUANE L. SMITH, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOE DRIVER, Warden…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jan 2, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:07cv156 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 2, 2008)