From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2016
Case No. CV 13-2444-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-2444-VAP (SP)

03-22-2016

JAMES ROGERS SMITH, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: March 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2016
Case No. CV 13-2444-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROGERS SMITH, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 13-2444-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2016)