From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV513 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV513

10-30-2020

RASHAUN SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By Memorandum Order entered on September 3, 2020, the Court directed Petitioner, within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof, to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition as required by Eastern District of Virginia Local Civil Rule 83.4(A). The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the above directive would result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed since the entry of the September 3, 2020 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Date: 30 October 2020
Richmond, Virginia

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV513 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:RASHAUN SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV513 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)