From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
Case No. 12-51536 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 3, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-51536

06-03-2013

GRACE SMITH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents.


Honorable Sean F. Cox


OPINION AND ORDER

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Grace Smith ("Smith") filed her petition on November 20, 2012, seeking to quash an administrative summons issued to CP Federal Credit Union by the Internal Revenue Services for financial information to determine Smith's 2007 to 2011 tax liability. (Docket Entry No. 1; Docket Entry No. 6, at 4.)

On January 18, 2013, the Defendants ("the Government") filed their Motion to Dismiss, asserting that Smith's motion to quash should be dismissed because it was untimely pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2)(A), it was not properly served pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i), and the Government issued the summons in good faith. (Docket Entry No. 6.)

Smith's petition to quash and the Government's motion to dismiss were referred to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson for a report and recommendation. (Docket Entry Nos. 2, 7.)

On May 8, 2013, Magistrate Judge Michelson filed her "Report and Recommendation on Petition to Quash [1] and Motion to Dismiss [6]" ("the R&R"), recommending that the Government's Motion to Dismiss [Docket Entry No. 6] be GRANTED and Smith's Petition to Quash Summons [Docket Entry No. 1] be DENIED because it was untimely. (Docket Entry No. 11, at 2, 7.)

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R.

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed any objections to the R&R.

The Court finds that the issues have been adequately presented in the parties' briefs and that oral argument would not significantly aid the decision making process. See Local Rule 7.1(f)(2), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan. The Court therefore orders that the motion will be decided on the briefs.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the May 8, 2013, R&R. For the reasons mentioned in the R&R, IT IS ORDERED that (1) Government's Motion to Dismiss [Docket Entry No. 6] is GRANTED; and (2) Smith's Petition to Quash Summon [Docket Entry No. 1] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Sean F. Cox

U. S. District Court Judge
I hereby certify that on June 3, 2013, the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record by electronic means and upon Grace Smith by First Class Mail at the address below: Grace Smith
159 Cherokee Cres
Jackson, MI 49203

J. McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
Case No. 12-51536 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GRACE SMITH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-51536 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 3, 2013)