From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jan 19, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-635 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-635

01-19-2021

DANIEL THOMASON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Daniel Thomason Smith, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), against the United States of America, President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, all United States Senators, Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Secretary of State of Texas, Governor Greg Abbott, United States District Judge Alia Moses, United States District Judge Orlando Garcia, United States Attorney Robert Pitman, United States Attorney Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney Rex Beasley, Assistant United States Attorney Gregory Surovic, United States Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad, and Michael Clark Gross.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Because the United States of America is the only proper defendant in an FTCA action, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the claims against the other defendants for want of jurisdiction. Galvin v. Occupational Safety & Health Admin., 860 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1988).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. The claims against the individual defendants must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections (#12) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#8) is ADOPTED. President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, all United States Senators, Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Secretary of State of Texas, Governor Greg Abbott, United States District Judge Alia Moses, United States District Judge Orlando Garcia, United States Attorney Robert Pitman, United States Attorney Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney Rex Beasley, Assistant United States Attorney Gregory Surovic, United States Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad, and Michael Clark Gross are DISMISSED from this action.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 19th day of January, 2021.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jan 19, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-635 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL THOMASON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jan 19, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-635 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2021)