From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jul 22, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00056 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 22, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00056 Criminal No. 2:16-cr-00030

07-22-2020

JEROME ANTHONY SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On January 16, 2018, the Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a Motion Under 28 U .S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Document 40). A Supplement § 2255 Motion (Document 55) was filed on April 4, 2019.

By Standing Order (Document 42) entered on January 17, 2018, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On June 26, 2020, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 61) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Petitioner's § 2555 Motion (Document 40) and Supplemental § 2555 Motion (Document 55), and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by July 13, 2020.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Petitioner's Motion Under 28 U .S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Document 40) and Supplemental § 2255 Motion (Document 55) be DENIED and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: July 22, 2020

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jul 22, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00056 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JEROME ANTHONY SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jul 22, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00056 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 22, 2020)

Citing Cases

Grant v. United States

Rather, he relies on two circuit court cases, United States v. Winstead, 890 F.3d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 2018), and…