From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02041-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02041-GMN-NJK

01-04-2023

MARLAINA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, et al.. Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 20]

Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff and Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC's stipulation, asking the Court to grant Defendant a 14-day extension to respond to Plaintiffs complaint. Docket No. 20. The stipulation fails to comply with the Local Rules. Specifically, a motion or stipulation seeking an extension must state why the requested extension is needed. Local Rule IA 6-1(a).

Accordingly, the parties' stipulation is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 20. Any I renewed stipulation must fully comply with this Court's Local Rules and must be submitted by January 6, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02041-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Trans Union, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARLAINA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, et al.. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02041-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)