From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Thomas-Street

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 29, 2024
Civil Action 24-CV-4215 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-CV-4215

08-29-2024

DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SIERRA THOMAS-STREET, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HARVEY BARTLE III, J.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff Deniya Nakeidra Smith's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1), and pro se Complaint (ECF No. 2) it is ORDERED that:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

3. The Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety for the reasons in the Court's Memorandum as follows:

a. Claims for which the Ase Family Trust is the true party in interest, including all claims for prospective injunctive relief, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Smith may not pursue those claims.
b. Smith's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. The Court certifies that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A).

5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Smith v. Thomas-Street

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 29, 2024
Civil Action 24-CV-4215 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Thomas-Street

Case Details

Full title:DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SIERRA THOMAS-STREET, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 29, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-CV-4215 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2024)