From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Tex. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 20, 2014
NO. 03-13-00204-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00204-CV

02-20-2014

Mary Smith and Jason Smith d/b/a Upscale Child Development Center, Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-12-001705, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mary Smith d/b/a Upscale Child Development Center, appearing pro se, has failed to prosecute this appeal. Mary's brief was due on October 25, 2013. On November 18, 2013, this Court's clerk sent Mary a notice informing her that her brief was overdue and cautioned that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless she filed a response reasonably explaining her failure to file a brief. The response was due by December 13, 2013. An attorney purporting to represent Mary has repeatedly professed an intent to file a brief and motion for extension of time, but to date none has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss Mary's appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Because both appellants share the same surname, we refer to them by their first names to avoid confusion.

While the notice of appeal Mary filed also purports to appeal on behalf of Jason Smith d/b/a Upscale Child Development Center, only Mary signed the notice of appeal. A layperson cannot file a notice of appeal on behalf of another person. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 7 (individual may appear pro se to litigate his own rights); Tex. R. App. P. 9.1(b) ("A party not represented by counsel must sign any document that the party files . . . ."); see also, e.g., Paselk v. Rabun, 293 S.W.3d 600, 606 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, pet. denied) (pro se party had no authority to file notice of appeal on other party's behalf). Accordingly, the notice of appeal Mary filed was not effective to perfect an appeal on Jason's behalf. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), (c) (appellate court has jurisdiction over all parties to the judgment or order appealed from if any party timely files a notice of appeal, but court "may not grant a party who does not file a notice of appeal more favorable relief than did the trial court except for just cause."). Because the record lacks any notice of appeal signed by Jason, we dismiss the appeal as to him. See id. ("Any party's failure . . . to perfect an appeal . . . does not deprive the appellate court of jurisdiction but is ground only for the appellate court to act appropriately, including dismissing the appeal.").

__________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Smith v. Tex. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Feb 20, 2014
NO. 03-13-00204-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Tex. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Mary Smith and Jason Smith d/b/a Upscale Child Development Center…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-13-00204-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2014)