From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Teske

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1445 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1445 MCE JFM P.

May 15, 2007


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed February 28, 2007, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Christison. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's claims against defendant Christison be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Smith v. Teske

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1445 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Smith v. Teske

Case Details

Full title:LEVI SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CLAIRE TESKE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 15, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1445 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)