From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0050 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0050.

April 1, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 13), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Restrepo is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and,

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Smith v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0050 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Tennis

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN SMITH v. FRANKLIN TENNIS, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 1, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0050 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2009)