Summary
denying Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings based on sovereign immunity because allegation in Complaint that state law required State Controller to deduct dues constituted "direct[] involve[ment] in executing the dues deductions"
Summary of this case from Allen v. Ohio Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'nOpinion
CV 19-00771 PA (FFMx)
12-04-2019
DOUGLAS SMITH, et al., Plaintiff, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010, et al., Defendants.
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court's December 3, 2019 Minute Order dismissing Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims with prejudice and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice; and
2. Plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 4, 2019
/s/_________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE