From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Taylor

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 266 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted September 18, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

David Alan Smith, Julian, CA, pro se.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Appellant's motion for summary reversal of the district court's December 6, 2005 judgment is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a); Schardt v. Payne, 414 F.3d 1025, 1038 (9th Cir.2005); United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.2002). This case is remanded to the district court for further consideration.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

REVERSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Taylor

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 266 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Smith v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:David Alan SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derek TAYLOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 266 (9th Cir. 2006)