From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 4, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-01038-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-01038-RFB-CWH

11-04-2015

WILLIAM SMITH et al., Plaintiff, v. ANNISHIA TAYLOR, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARL W. HOFFMAN

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) of the Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 30, 2015.

A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct "any review," de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by October 17, 2015. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation(s).

While the Court notes that the Report and Recommendation addressed to Plaintiff William Smith was returned as undeliverable on October 19, 2015, under Local Rule of Special Proceeding and Appeals LSR 2-2, failure to maintain an updated address is further grounds for dismissal of the suit.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice. .

IT IS FURTHER ORDER that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice and that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on the person(s) and respective addresses noted in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.

DATED this 4th day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 4, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-01038-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SMITH et al., Plaintiff, v. ANNISHIA TAYLOR, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-01038-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2015)