From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Reg'l Transp.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 14, 2012
SC: 142515 (Mich. Dec. 14, 2012)

Opinion

SC: 142515 COA: 294311 Wayne CC: 08-113926-NO

12-14-2012

MARK SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellant.


Order


Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

Justices

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REINSTATE the September 9, 2009 order of the Wayne Circuit Court. See Atkins v SMART, 492 Mich 707 (2012).

MARILYN KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in Atkins v SMART, 492 Mich 707, 723 (2012).

HATHAWAY, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

______________________

Clerk


Summaries of

Smith v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Reg'l Transp.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 14, 2012
SC: 142515 (Mich. Dec. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Reg'l Transp.

Case Details

Full title:MARK SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 14, 2012

Citations

SC: 142515 (Mich. Dec. 14, 2012)