Opinion
No. 05-06-00183-CR
Opinion issued March 5, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-34509-U.
Before Chief Justice THOMAS and Justices FITZGERALD and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Steven Glen Smith of sexual assault and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.