From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 4D16-3958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D16-3958

02-16-2017

ERNEST SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Ernest Smith, Crawfordville, pro se. No appearance for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432014CF001486A. Ernest Smith, Crawfordville, pro se. No appearance for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CIKLIN, C.J., GERBER and KUNTZ, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 4D16-3958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

No. 4D16-3958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2017)