Smith v. State

Full title: EUGENE SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA SECRETARY OF…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 4, 2016

188 So. 3d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–0193.

03-04-2016

Eugene SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of FLORIDA, Florida SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Eugene Smith, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Petitioner is warned that any future pleadings determined by this court to be frivolous or successive may result in the imposition of sanctions against him, including a prohibition against any future pro se appeals or petitions challenging the judgment and sentence in Okaloosa County Circuit court case number 2008–CF–0705 and a referral to the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2015). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

ROBERTS, C. J., MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.