From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 18, 2015
No. 69099 (Nev. Dec. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 69099

12-18-2015

WILLIE JAMES SMITH, JR., Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order directing the district court to consider his postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160. We are confident that the district court will resolve all pending matters as expeditiously as its calendar permits. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge

Willie James Smith, Jr.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Smith v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 18, 2015
No. 69099 (Nev. Dec. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JAMES SMITH, JR., Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 18, 2015

Citations

No. 69099 (Nev. Dec. 18, 2015)