Smith v. State

Full title: D'Andre SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

125 So. 3d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–1626.

2013-01-23

D'Andre SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 472006CF000791A, 472006CF000792A, 472006CF000899A, and 472006CF000939A. D'Andre Smith, Crawfordville, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 472006CF000791A, 472006CF000792A, 472006CF000899A, and 472006CF000939A.
D'Andre Smith, Crawfordville, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See§ 958.045(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006); Ch. 2006–270, § 1, at 2841–42, Laws of Fla. (effective July 1, 2006) (“If the [youthful] offender violates the conditions of probation, the court may revoke probation and impose any sentence that it might have originally imposed.”); see also Love v. State, 24 So.3d 704, 705 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), subsequent appeal,60 So.3d 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); accord Negron v. State, 90 So.3d 948, 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.