From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 9, 2014
CASE NO.: SC14-1936 (Fla. Dec. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC14-1936

12-09-2014

LONNIE SMITH Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 1D14-3637; 1D14-3541; 572014CA000675CAAXMX

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 357 So. 2d 464, 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court. PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
/s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
LONNIE SMITH
HON. DONALD C. SPENCER, CLERK
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 9, 2014
CASE NO.: SC14-1936 (Fla. Dec. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE SMITH Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 9, 2014

Citations

CASE NO.: SC14-1936 (Fla. Dec. 9, 2014)