From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Mar 20, 2012
388 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97019.

2012-03-20

Derrick SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge. Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.


Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Derrick Smith (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Mar 20, 2012
388 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrick SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

388 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Bowersox

On March 20, 2012, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's denial of the motion. (Id., Ex.…