From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 7, 1976
228 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. 1976)

Opinion

31207.

ARGUED JUNE 15, 1976.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1976.

Armed robbery. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Harrison.

Calhoun Donaldson, R. B. Donaldson, Jr., for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., District Attorney, Robert M. Hitch, III, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to eight years imprisonment. He appeals.

The evidence shows that the appellant entered upon the property of George Clayton's Quick Market and at gunpoint robbed George Fountain, a salesman who was in the process of making a delivery from his truck located in the parking area.

1. During the trial of the case, the prosecutor, over objection, introduced testimony from George Clayton identifying appellant as one of two robbers who had held him up at an earlier time. The court permitted the testimony to establish motive, scheme, prior similar conduct, and bent of mind. Clayton made a positive identification of appellant and recited details of his robbery. The only similarity between the two robberies was the location. This is not sufficient to connect the two crimes and permit the introduction of evidence of an independent crime. See Cawthon v. State, 119 Ga. 395 (5) ( 46 S.E. 897) (1904) and related cases.

2. Objection to the court's failure to rule on a portion of the district attorney's closing argument (making reference to the appellant's failure to tell arresting officers that he had an alibi) presents nothing for the court's review. But see Doyle v. Ohio, ___ U.S. ___ ( 96 S.C. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.


ARGUED JUNE 15, 1976 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1976.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 7, 1976
228 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. 1976)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 7, 1976

Citations

228 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. 1976)
228 S.E.2d 811

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

Appellant correctly notes that any geographic similarity between the two offenses is a mere superficial…