From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 19, 1955
162 Tex. Crim. 132 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)

Opinion

No. 27710.

October 19, 1955.

Appeal from the District Court, Ward County, G. C. Olsen, J.

Howze Howze, by Murray J. Howze, Monahans, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


This is a conviction for forgery, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Under the statute, Art. 979, P.C., an essential element of the crime of forgery is the making 'without lawful authority' of a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of another, with the intent to injure or defraud.

The instant indictment contains no allegation that the check described therein, which upon its face purported to be the act of another, was made 'without lawful authority'.

The absence of such allegation renders the indictment fatally defective. Branch's P.C., Sec. 1403, p. 856; Willson's Criminal Forms, No. 430; Pye v. State, 71 Tex.Crim. 94, 154 S.W. 222.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 19, 1955
162 Tex. Crim. 132 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Billy J. SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 19, 1955

Citations

162 Tex. Crim. 132 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)
162 Tex. Crim. 132

Citing Cases

Minix v. State

In that respect the present forgery statute did not change its predecessor which included "without lawful…

Landry v. State

It is true that under the former code an indictment had to allege "without lawful authority" or it was…