From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 19, 1929
120 So. 917 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

8 Div. 810.

March 19, 1929.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; James E. Horton, Judge.

Raymond Smith was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Almon Almon, of Decatur, for appellant.

The predicate laid for introduction of the stenographic report of the testimony of witness James did not meet the requirements of the rule. Mitchell v. State, 114 Ala. 1, 22 So. 71; State Bank v. Seawell, 18 Ala. 616; Harris v. State, 73 Ala. 495; Wigginton v. State, 17 Ala. App. 651, 87 So. 698; Gaither v. State, 22 Ala. App. 315, 115 So. 291; Hines v. Miniard, 208 Ala. 176, 94 So. 302.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


Over objection and exception of defendant seasonably reserved, the court admitted a transcript of the testimony of Johnnie James given and taken down on the preliminary hearing of this case. The predicate laid for the introduction of this evidence was as follows:

"Q. Where is he (Johnnie James) at this time? Ans. Pine Bluff, Ark.

"Q. How long has he been there? Ans. Probably four or five months."

No subpœna had been issued for Johnnie James, nor was there other evidence on this subject. The predicate laid was not sufficient. Hines v. Miniard, 208 Ala. 176, 94 So. 302; Kimble v. State, 21 Ala. App. 528, 109 So. 610.

Charges refused were covered by the court in his general charge or in other given charges.

Other rulings of the court were free from error.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 19, 1929
120 So. 917 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 19, 1929

Citations

120 So. 917 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
120 So. 917